Big Game Hunting: What’s My Line – Kings v. Sharks 5-18-2013

Inevitable comparisons to last year’s Playoff run dominate the media coverage of the Defending Champions, and rightly so. Similarities and contrasts range the gamut: personnel, scoring, standings going in, home v. road records, etc. Perhaps no greater contrast, and no greater indicator of just how hard it is to repeat, is presented by the ways in which Coach Sutter is handling his player combinations, meaning forward lines and defense pairs, at even strength and on special teams.

In last year’s run, the forward lines were constant, nearly unchanged, throughout 4 series, 20 games, and the winning of a Stanley Cup. The only changes made for even strength play was to the forward lines, and were related to health: Clifford going out to injury, for example, or Gagne coming in after recuperation. On special teams, an adjustment was made against New Jersey to use straight line combinations, replacing all-star mixings, but in essence the forwards were always the same guys, and skated together in the same groupings, for the entire run.

The Defense pairs also remained the same for the entire run, even including special teams assignments: the same 6 guys dressed every game and played alongside the same partners, every game.

In last night’s game, there were more forward line combinations used than were used the entire 20-game run last year: I counted 23 distinct, intentional iterations used by Coach Sutter. Forget the bingo ball generator, this was more like radiated DNA after the puree cycle on a kitchen blender performing cell division in zero gravity.

The changes began in the 2nd period. Here is how the game was started:

5-18-2013-San Jose Game 3bIce times remained mostly per usual, looking at each player game over game. To me, the changes, therefore, were not made as punishment to any particular player. Nobody got “benched” or had their minutes significantly reduced. I think that in order to understand the thinking, we need to establish certain imperatives, some of which existed going in.

Of course, we could just say, “Sutter needed more, so he was looking for a spark.” That would be true, but incomplete. Part of the fun of being a fan is to cheer when it’s going good and complain when it ain’t. If we are gonna complain, we are probably gonna criticize, and when you criticize you should at least attempt a working understanding of what the person you are criticizing was trying to accomplish. In that endeavor, if you are even still reading, we continue.

Tanner Pearson was inserted for Jordan Nolan, to play his first ever NHL game in the 2nd round of the Playoffs. Nolan played 6:11 last game, but Sutter is on record as saying 4th line guys should play 8 or 9 minutes. Pearson was given 5:44. This seems to be in keeping with Nolan, which is less than ideal, but is not unexpected. Sutter also said Pearson was “fine” in his first game. Pearson is not the reason lines were changed so dramatically.

Another factor is that there is an extra day of rest before the next game on Tuesday night; Sutter could safely use guys for extra minutes, knowing they could rest up. This did not really happen. Ice time went up for the King/Richards/Carter line, but only slightly, and this line was the most constant line combination, staying together through all 3 periods. Ice time for Brown actually went down, Kopi was normal, and Williams was at his normal. That line, however, was cannibalized throughout the game.

Barring injury, Sutter usually skates lines as they start the game all the way thru the 1st period with no changes. If he is going to make changes, it usually comes about mid-point in the 2nd. In this game, it happened just that way.

At 11:50 in the 2nd, Williams was the first player to be removed from his starting position when Richardson took a shift replacing Williams. This was well after Williams took a big hit, and had nothing to do with any special teams scrambling. It was either a Coach’s decision or an equipment failure, but Williams missed shifts at even strength and was then left off his usual spot on the #2 Power Play unit, also, during the 2nd period.

Williams re-appeared on the 1st shift after that Power Play, skating with Pearson and Richardson. Williams then finished the 2nd period back at his starting place with Brown/Kopi, but in the 3rd, that line would only skate together once, about 15 minutes in.

Richardson would go on to play all 3 forward positions, at RW with Brown/Kopi, with Brown/Fraser each for one shift and with Penner/Kopi for 3 shifts. Richardson also spent time Centering Pearson/Williams one shift, King/Brown one shift, and Penner/Williams another. At LW, Richardson played next to Carter at Center and Williams at RW for a shift.

Brown’s night was quite varied, including 6 different lines at LW and one at RW. The Right Wing shift was the one above with King at Left Wing and Richardson at Center. ¬†After the first shakeup with Richardson taking William’s spot with Brown and Kopi, Brown’s linemates were Lewis at Center and Williams at RW for 5 shifts. Brown also skated journeyman LW lines for 1 shift, first with Fraser/Richardson, and then with Kopitar and Lewis during the final minute of regulation time.

Lewis skated at RW with King/Kopi, and Brown/Kopi for 1 shift each. He also centered the one shift with Brown and Williams, and pulled double-duty on PK and PP.

Penner played Left Wing only, but with many groupings. For 1 shift each he played with Kopi/Williams and then Richardson/Williams, and with Richards/Lewis then Richards/Toffoli. Penner may have found a new home having skated with Kopitar at Center, and Richardson at Right Wing for 3 shifts in the 3rd, until Kopi was used to kill a penalty and line formulations had to recover. Penner also got the Williams time on the Power Play in the 2nd period.

It seems to me that Sutter’s imperative was that the Brown/Kopitar/Williams line was not working well enough, and he began looking for new combos from that. He would try Brown and Kopi with another winger, then tried Kopi/Williams with another winger, then settled on Brown and Williams with Lewis (5 shifts), and Kopitar with Penner and Richardson, for 3 shifts. King/Richards/Carter reconstituted naturally, like mercury seeking itself in a shallow bowl. Pearson and Fraser were cut back in minutes, and Toffoli lost some of his linemates but was skated for the requisite 13 minutes of a 3rd line Right winger.

This game was a brutal, all-out and all-in effort, by both teams. Strong play was made by both sides, each for extended sections of time, but the Sharks had more push and carried play for more time. It would be easy to rail on the officiating, and I will get to that briefly, but in the overall the Sharks played a little better, a little longer, and only Quick made the game so close. Probably the more deserving team, based on efficiency but not at all on effort or heart, won the game.

As for the officiating, Quick’s post-game misconduct penalty was final evidence of a clear bias in the area of calling penalties for contact with the goalie. Incidental contact with Quick was entirely overlooked, while penalty-worthy contact was deemed incidental or was also completely overlooked.

Conversely, Lewis was called for a penalty when he was railroaded by Marleau into Niemi: the right call could have been either incidental contact, or co-incidental minors for (1) interference to Marleau and (2) goalie interference to Lewis. The Lewis call could have been the right call if the Referees had been consistent in making those calls earlier against San Jose, but letting things go all game and then calling something similar, especially to give a two-man advantage in the last 2 minutes of regulation, is drastically inconsistent.

Having reviewed the play, I have more disagreement with the Regehr hooking call than the Lewis call. Hooking is usually horizontal stick contact with the body, and Regehr looked to have vertical contact with the player’s stick.

All in all, this was a tight, hard game, with the home team’s slight edge in play helped by some uneven officiating. The Kings fought valiantly, and no dominance was established by the victors. I daresay that the Sharks really cannot claim any momentum, as they will again be playing for their lives in game 4.

The Kings needed a split, and they can still get it. In reality, this game nearly afforded the Kings a chance to sweep the series, but the loss is just that: one loss, in a game that could easily have gone either way.

This entry was posted in Game BreakDown, Really Long Stuff. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Big Game Hunting: What’s My Line – Kings v. Sharks 5-18-2013

  1. Mik3ysfv says:

    You referenced last year’s consistency in the run to the Cup. I agree. It has made a difference this year. The breakouts are just not crisp. We are getting bottled up in the neutral zone, and having a very hard time gaining the offensive zone. I keep thinking of last year as a breakout clinic. This year, with the new faces and the constant shuttling in and shuttling out of faces, has had a dire effect on our breakouts. the breakout alone is the one thing I focus on that is so drastically different this year from last year. The big problem this year, is the lack of practice time with the compact schedule. I sure hope the focus of every practice is that breakout. Anyway, it has been a while since I have said hello, so hello X!

    • Player X says:

      Great point, re the practice time. I am looking for the Kings defensemen to activate more smartly, the weak side guy needs to be available as an outlet if things get bottled up, and the first D man with the puck would do well to skate past his guy to create more room.
      Basically, we agree completely as to the breakout being the engine, I am hoping the medicine to cure the ill will be more activation from the weak side guy to create a passing lane other than the forwards, and also more skating from the D man with the puck to do the same thing.
      Somebody has to beat the first forechecker, by stickhandling or skating or both. Do that three or four times and the pressure will ease cuz the Sharks will have to back up.

  2. bbb7 says:

    Williams had a bad game, perhaps from lingering effects from that hit, and he’s the straw that stirs the #1 line, no matter how skilled Kopi is. Kopi really doesnt bring much creativity, which is partly because he’s so responsible defensively, but if JW isn’t on then that line suffers.

    Keeping the King/Richards/Carter line intact just means King will continue to impair his linemates’ chances for offense. Toffoli has proven himself responsible enough defensively that it’s time to move him up to that #2 line and generate some offense; the team is starved for goals right now.

    • Player X says:

      Agree with the King assessment totally. The Kings are short a scoring left winger as long as Penner is kept down. I think Sutter uses King to have bulk defensively and protect Richards cuz he is getting beaten by Thornton and Burns, but Penner would have more offensive upside. Actually, here is what I want to see:
      23 11 14
      25 77 73
      74 10 22
      15 24 71

      Or…
      23 11 73
      25 10 77
      74 22 14
      15 24 71

      I would also love to see Sutter skate the lines as they are, on the Power Play. If a line (23 11 14) is struggling, give them some damn Power Play time, it worked great this year, I did a whole article on it… http://holdthepoint.com/2013/04/15/power-surge-wiring-diagrams-for-l-a-kings-power-play/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>